Hour 1 of The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show delivers a wide-ranging, politically charged discussion centered on a major Supreme Court decision on birthright citizenship, which dominates the hour and drives broader debates on immigration policy, constitutional law, and American identity. Hosting solo, Buck Sexton frames the 6–3 ruling as one of the most consequential—and controversial—judicial decisions in modern history, emphasizing that the Court upheld the interpretation that anyone born on U.S. soil is a citizen (with limited exceptions such as diplomats), including children of undocumented immigrants and so-called “birth tourism.” The conversation repeatedly highlights concerns about immigration loopholes, anchor babies, and national security risks, arguing that the ruling could incentivize foreign nationals to exploit U.S. laws, particularly citing China as a geopolitical rival.

Sexton underscores that the Court’s majority viewed birthright citizenship as constitutionally protected under the 14th Amendment, meaning that changing the policy would require a constitutional amendment rather than congressional legislation, a point he stresses as a major obstacle for immigration reform.

Congressman Jim Jordan of Ohio calls in and analyzes dissenting opinions from Justices Alito, Thomas, and Gorsuch, portraying the ruling as an example of judicial overreach versus originalist constitutional interpretation, while also drawing comparisons to historically controversial Supreme Court cases like Dred Scott and Roe v. Wade. The discussion expands into immigration enforcement policy, including critiques of sanctuary cities, catch-and-release practices, and the broader political divide between Republicans and Democrats on border security. There is also a significant focus on how birthright citizenship could influence future political eligibility, chain migration, and even hypothetical national security threats, such as foreign-born individuals returning to the U.S. as citizens after being raised abroad.

In addition to the headline case, Hour 1 briefly covers other Supreme Court rulings, including a decision on transgender athletes and Title IX, which Sexton characterizes as a victory for those advocating that biological sex should determine participation in sports, reinforcing the legal definition of sex-based separation in education. This ruling is described as important but ultimately overshadowed by the birthright citizenship decision. The hour also touches on a campaign finance ruling, though it is framed as a minor issue compared to the broader constitutional implications of immigration and citizenship law.

Other segments in this hour include discussion of legislative responses and political strategy, with calls for Congress to pursue tighter immigration laws, restrict birth tourism, and potentially revisit the 14th Amendment. The show also delves into current political dynamics and upcoming elections, highlighting Republican optimism in key races and emphasizing the role of voter turnout and immigration as a defining campaign issue.

Make sure you never miss a second of the show by subscribing to the Clay Travis & Buck Sexton show podcast wherever you get your podcasts! ihr.fm/3InlkL8

For the latest updates from Clay & Buck, visit our website https://www.clayandbuck.com/

Connect with Clay Travis and Buck Sexton: 

X - https://x.com/clayandbuck

FB - https://www.facebook.com/ClayandBuck/

IG -

Hour 2 of The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show delivers a wide-ranging, high-energy discussion centered on breaking Supreme Court decisions, constitutional law, immigration policy, and the national debate over women’s sports and Title IX, with strong commentary on the political and cultural implications of these issues. The hour opens with analysis of a major Supreme Court ruling on birthright citizenship, where the Court struck down a policy challenge and reaffirmed long-standing interpretations of the Constitution. Clay and Buck frame the decision as highly consequential for U.S. immigration policy, arguing it preserves incentives for birth tourism and so-called “anchor baby” dynamics, while raising concerns about taxpayer burdens, healthcare costs, and the long-term value of American citizenship. They also emphasize the ideological fractures within the Court, noting that key conservative justices joined the liberal bloc, reinforcing their broader argument that the Supreme Court has become increasingly political and unreliable as a consistently conservative institution.

Building on that theme, the hosts explore the limited ability of Congress to address immigration outcomes shaped by judicial rulings, pointing out that any meaningful reform would likely require a constitutional amendment, a near-impossible hurdle in today’s political climate. They connect this to broader concerns about national sovereignty, border policy, and executive authority, while referencing discussions with lawmakers like Jim Jordan about potential—but constrained—legislative responses.

The conversation then pivots to a second major and more positively framed Supreme Court case involving Title IX and women’s sports, which Clay and Buck describe as a significant victory for competitive fairness and biological distinctions in athletics. The Court’s 6–3 ruling upholds state laws such as West Virginia’s Save Women’s Sports Act and Idaho’s Fairness in Women’s Sports Act, affirming that school sports teams can be designated based on biological sex at birth. The hosts outline the legal reasoning, emphasizing that Title IX protections were originally designed to expand opportunities for biological females, and argue that allowing biological males who identify as female to compete in women’s sports undermines decades of progress in female athletics, equal opportunity, and athlete safety.

A substantial portion of Hour 2 is dedicated to the transgender athlete debate, which Clay and Buck frame as one of the defining cultural and legal issues in America today. They discuss real-world cases involving transgender participation in girls’ sports, citing concerns about physical advantages such as bone density, testosterone levels, and muscle mass, and argue that these differences create unfair competition and potential safety risks. The hosts also critique dissenting Supreme Court justices, claiming their interpretation of gender identity under Title IX conflicts with biological reality and the law’s original intent.

The broader political implications are a recurring theme, with Clay and Buck asserting that Democrats are uniformly aligned on expanding gender identity protections, while Republicans have an opportunity to push back by emphasizing science, fairness, and women’s rights. They extend this argument beyond sports into other policy areas, including prison placement policies and public safety, arguing that similar ideological conflicts are emerging across multiple institutions.

Throughout Hour 2, the hosts blend legal analysis with cultural commentary and audience engagement, including listener calls that reinforce the intensity of public opinion on these topics. While there are lighter moments touching on music and personal anecdotes, the core of the hour remains focused on constitutional interpretation, Supreme Court rulings, immigration debates, and the future of women’s sports in America.

Make sure you never miss a second of the show by subscribing to the Clay Travis & Buck Sexton show podcast wherever you get your podcasts! ihr.fm/3InlkL8

For the latest updates from Clay & Buck, visit our website https://www.clayandbuck.com/

Connect with Clay Travis and Buck Sexton: 

X -

Hour 3 of the Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show delivers a wide-ranging, high-energy discussion centered on criminal justice reform, immigration policy, Supreme Court rulings, constitutional law, and rising socialist ideology in U.S. politics, featuring in-studio guest Rafael Mangual, author of Criminal Injustice. This third hour emphasizes a deep dive into crime policy, policing debates, and the real-world consequences of progressive reforms, alongside culturally charged conversations about gender identity issues, free speech, and American political identity.

The hour begins with Mangual’s expert analysis of criminal justice reform and the push for decarceration and depolicing, arguing that these policies—widely supported after the 2020 protests—have had harmful effects, particularly in urban communities and among Black Americans. The discussion frames rising crime trends and the subsequent reversal of some reforms as evidence that reduced policing and leniency in prosecution increased violence, with hosts emphasizing that effective policing historically correlates with lower homicide rates and improved public safety outcomes. Mangual underscores that incarceration serves a critical role in crime prevention through incapacitation, challenging progressive narratives that prioritize rehabilitation over deterrence.

A major legal and political focus of Hour 3 is the Supreme Court ruling on birthright citizenship, sparking a detailed constitutional debate. Mangual aligns more closely with the dissenting justices, questioning whether the 14th Amendment’s original intent supports granting automatic citizenship to children of non-citizens or temporary visitors, including so-called “birth tourism” cases. The conversation highlights competing interpretations among justices such as Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh, and critiques the use of executive action instead of legislative authority. The hosts and guest ultimately argue that any meaningful change would require congressional action or a constitutional amendment—an extremely unlikely outcome, reinforcing the political stalemate around immigration reform.

The immigration discussion is further enriched by Mangual’s personal family story, offering a compelling example of legal immigration and the traditional American success narrative. He recounts how his Dominican grandfather aided U.S. Marines during political unrest following the fall of dictator Rafael Trujillo, which helped him secure legal entry into the United States. This story highlights themes of patriotism, opportunity, and lawful immigration pathways, contrasting sharply with current debates over illegal immigration and citizenship policy.

Hour 3 also examines New York City politics and the rise of democratic socialism, particularly within immigrant communities. The hosts discuss a recent congressional primary involving a socialist candidate who prevailed despite limited support from the local Dominican population, illustrating tensions between progressive activist groups and traditional immigrant voters. This leads to a broader conversation about identity politics, nationalism, and intra-community اختلافs, as well as the misconception that minority groups uniformly support progressive platforms.

In a broader ideological critique, the hosts pivot to a warning about communism, socialism, and collectivist political movements, describing them as a growing threat to American liberty. They draw historical comparisons to regimes under Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot, arguing that modern “democratic socialist” rhetoric obscures the realities of centralized power and individual rights erosion. This segment frames contemporary policy proposals—such as expanded government benefits—as part of a continuum of collectivist ideology, while emphasizing the importance of free markets, individualism, and constitutional governance.

[6/30/2026 3:03 PM] Mark Weiner: Cultural issues also play a significant role in this hour, including debate over transgender athletes in women’s sports and broader discussions around gender identity language and media coverage. The hosts critique what they see as shifting societal norms and media framing, linking these debates to ongoing First Amendment and cultural conflicts in the United States.

Finally, Hour 3 returns to the Supreme Court with discussion of a major campaign finance decision striking down political spending limits, which is framed as a First Amendment victory for political speech. The hosts contrast conservative and progressive approaches to free speech, arguing that the left increasingly supports restrictions when politically advantageous. The hour closes with listener questions on state-level rules for transgender sports participation and constitutional processes such as an Article V convention, reinforcing the show’s focus on constitution

As America prepares to celebrate its 250th birthday, Mary Katharine Ham and Karol Markowicz examine the growing influence of democratic socialism across the country and ask whether New York City's political shift could spread nationwide.

The conversation explores the rise of Zohran Mamdani and other Democratic Socialist candidates, the economic consequences of rent control, the importance of free-market principles, and why understanding America's founding ideals matters more than ever. They also discuss escalating political extremism, antisemitism on the far left, and the viral confrontation involving California State Senator Scott Wiener.

MK & Karol wrap with a patriotic discussion on America's 250th anniversary, sharing the historic moments each host wishes they could have witnessed—from the Revolutionary War to Ronald Reagan's historic 1984 landslide victory.

Follow Clay & Buck on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuck

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Buck Sexton breaks down a series of significant but not “mega-case” Supreme Court rulings that nonetheless have major implications for governance and constitutional law. Buck highlights a pivotal 6–3 decision affirming broad presidential power, emphasizing that President Donald Trump has expanded authority to remove federal agency officials—even without traditional “for cause” limitations—particularly in quasi-independent regulatory bodies like the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). The ruling specifically affirms Trump’s ability to dismiss officials such as FTC Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter, signaling a major shift in the balance between the executive branch and entrenched bureaucratic structures often referred to as the “deep state.” However, Buck notes that this authority is not absolute, as questions remain about whether similar power extends to institutions like the Federal Reserve, where figures such as Governor Lisa Cook may still be insulated from direct presidential removal due to the Fed’s quasi-independent status. Former Navy SEAL and Clay & Buck Podcast Network host David Rutherford for an extended conversation examining the worsening crisis in Haiti and its direct connection to the U.S. immigration debate. A major focus of this hour is the Trump administration’s efforts to end or scale back Temporary Protected Status for Haitian nationals, prompting discussion about whether TPS programs are truly temporary and how U.S. immigration law should address countries experiencing prolonged instability. Buck and Rutherford explore the argument that Haiti’s conditions remain dire while also debating whether indefinite TPS extensions effectively create a permanent immigration pathway outside normal legal channels. The conversation frequently returns to the broader themes of immigration enforcement, border policy, legal immigration versus illegal immigration, deportation policy, and the long-term impact of large-scale migration on American communities. A major portion of the final hour centered on Mamdani’s political philosophy and national ambitions. Buck analyzed a television interview in which Mamdani was asked about presidential eligibility requirements for naturalized citizens. Mamdani stated that he supports keeping the Constitution unchanged, despite not being a natural-born citizen himself. Buck used the exchange to argue that Mamdani is becoming a national spokesperson for progressive politics and democratic socialism. He contrasted Mamdani with Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, suggesting that while AOC has moderated some of her rhetoric as her political career has advanced, Mamdani currently represents the leading edge of the Democratic Party’s progressive movement. The discussion then shifted to democratic socialism, with Buck reacting to Mamdani’s argument that New Yorkers have already experienced successful socialist-style governance. Mamdani cited accomplishments including expanded childcare programs, tenant relief initiatives, infrastructure work, and public safety metrics as evidence that progressive policies can deliver tangible results. Buck challenged that framing, arguing that many left-wing policies appear successful in their early stages because benefits are immediate while costs emerge much later. He compared the situation to earlier debates surrounding former New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio, California Governor Gavin Newsom, and the Affordable Care Act, arguing that long-term consequences often become apparent only after policies have been in place for years.

Make sure you never miss a second of the show by subscribing to the Clay Travis & Buck Sexton show podcast wherever you get your podcasts!  ihr.fm/3InlkL8

For the latest updates from Clay and Buck, visit our website https://www.clayandbuck.com/

Connect with Clay Travis and Buck Sexton: 

X - https://x.com/clayandbuck

FB -

In Hour 1 of The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show, Buck Sexton hosts solo while Clay Travis remains on vacation, delivering a wide-ranging, high-energy discussion of breaking political news, Supreme Court rulings, election integrity, and global geopolitical tensions ahead of America’s 250th anniversary. This Hour 1 segment focuses heavily on the latest U.S. Supreme Court decisions, the scope of presidential authority under Donald Trump, election law controversies, and foreign policy developments involving Iran, while also touching on domestic political narratives and immigration policy debates. A central theme in this Hour 1 recap is a series of significant but not “mega-case” Supreme Court rulings that nonetheless have major implications for governance and constitutional law. Buck highlights a pivotal 6–3 decision affirming broad presidential power, emphasizing that President Donald Trump has expanded authority to remove federal agency officials—even without traditional “for cause” limitations—particularly in quasi-independent regulatory bodies like the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). The ruling specifically affirms Trump’s ability to dismiss officials such as FTC Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter, signaling a major shift in the balance between the executive branch and entrenched bureaucratic structures often referred to as the “deep state.” However, Buck notes that this authority is not absolute, as questions remain about whether similar power extends to institutions like the Federal Reserve, where figures such as Governor Lisa Cook may still be insulated from direct presidential removal due to the Fed’s quasi-independent status. Another key legal development discussed in Hour 1 is a controversial 5–4 Supreme Court decision on election law (Watson v. RNC), which allows ballots postmarked by Election Day to be counted if received up to several days later. Buck frames this ruling as a major flashpoint in the ongoing election integrity debate, arguing that redefining “Election Day” into a multi-day process could introduce vulnerabilities, including delayed ballot surges that might influence close races. He contrasts the majority opinion—joined by Justices including Amy Coney Barrett and Chief Justice John Roberts—with a sharp dissent warning that the decision departs from longstanding statutory and historical norms governing U.S. elections. The discussion expands into broader concerns about voter fraud, ballot counting procedures, and public trust in elections, making election law one of the dominant SEO topics in this hour. Foreign policy is another major pillar of Hour 1, particularly ongoing tensions with Iran, which Buck describes as unresolved and “not a done deal.” He previews updates from President Trump regarding military actions, ceasefire enforcement, and the possibility of further escalation tied to Iran’s nuclear ambitions. The conversation also connects geopolitical instability to domestic concerns like oil and gas prices, underscoring how international conflict can influence the U.S. economy and political landscape. On immigration and humanitarian policy, Buck examines Temporary Protected Status (TPS)—with a particular focus on Haiti—framing it as a controversial and often misunderstood policy that has effectively become long-term rather than temporary. He describes Haiti as a failed state dominated by armed gangs, setting up a deeper discussion to be continued later in the program with guest David Rutherford. [6/29/2026 1:25 PM] Greg Chapin: Domestically, Buck comments on New York City politics, referencing Zohran Mamdani in the context of progressive governance and policy debates, while observing that the city remains economically active despite criticism of its leadership. This ties into a broader critique of left-leaning policy approaches and media narratives. Finally, Hour 1 reflects on the anniversary of the June 27, 2024 presidential debate, which Buck characterizes as a decisive moment that solidified President Donald Trump’s political standing. He criticizes media coverage and Democratic Party reactions, framing them as evidence of broader credibility issues and political spin, further reinforcing the show’s recurring themes of media bias, political accountability, and narrative control. Overall, Hour 1 of The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show delivers a comprehensive mix of breaking Supreme Court news, executive power analysis, election law controversy, Iran foreign policy updates, and immigration policy debate, all framed through Buck Sexton’s solo-hosted perspective, making it a packed and highly topical start to the broadcast.

Make sure you never miss a second of the show by subscribing to the Clay Travis & Buck Sexton show podcast wherever you get your podcasts!  ihr.fm/3InlkL8

For the latest updates from C

In Hour 2 of The Clay Travis & Buck Sexton Show, Buck Sexton hosts the program by himself and delivers an in-depth discussion centered on Haiti, Temporary Protected Status (TPS), immigration policy, failed states, border security, and the humanitarian and geopolitical implications of Haiti’s ongoing collapse. The hour begins with Buck welcoming former Navy SEAL and Clay & Buck Podcast Network host David Rutherford for an extended conversation examining the worsening crisis in Haiti and its direct connection to the U.S. immigration debate. A major focus of this hour is the Trump administration’s efforts to end or scale back Temporary Protected Status for Haitian nationals, prompting discussion about whether TPS programs are truly temporary and how U.S. immigration law should address countries experiencing prolonged instability. Buck and Rutherford explore the argument that Haiti’s conditions remain dire while also debating whether indefinite TPS extensions effectively create a permanent immigration pathway outside normal legal channels. The conversation frequently returns to the broader themes of immigration enforcement, border policy, legal immigration versus illegal immigration, deportation policy, and the long-term impact of large-scale migration on American communities. The bulk of Hour 2 is devoted to a detailed examination of Haiti’s political, economic, and security collapse. Buck and Rutherford describe Haiti as one of the most dysfunctional countries in the Western Hemisphere, comparing its current conditions to failed states such as Somalia, Liberia, and Sierra Leone during periods of civil conflict and warlord rule. They discuss how criminal gangs now dominate much of the country, including large portions of Port-au-Prince, and how gang violence, extortion, kidnappings, and the breakdown of public institutions have left ordinary Haitians trapped in a climate of fear and instability. Rutherford shares his personal experiences with Haiti, including missionary work, disaster-relief involvement following the earthquake, and years of observing the country’s challenges firsthand. The discussion reviews Haiti’s long history of political turmoil, references the eras of Jean-Bertrand Aristide and the Duvalier regime, and examines previous U.S. military and international interventions. Buck and Rutherford also discuss reports of anti-gang operations involving drone strikes, illustrating how severe the security situation has become. The hour further explores how criminal organizations allegedly control transportation routes, levy unofficial “taxes,” extort businesses and residents, and profit from smuggling, human trafficking, and narcotics activity. The hosts argue that Haiti suffers from a near-total collapse of governance and debate what, if any, outside intervention could realistically restore stability. They also evaluate the effectiveness of past United Nations missions, the ongoing Kenyan-led international security effort, and proposals involving military, law-enforcement, or private-security solutions. As the conversation shifts toward U.S. domestic politics, Buck discusses the impact of Haitian migration on communities such as Springfield, Ohio, where the presence of a large Haitian population has become a national political issue. He examines disputes over immigration policy, community consent, welfare spending, labor markets, and the distinction between humanitarian concerns and immigration enforcement. Listeners call in to share their experiences from Haiti and other conflict zones, with several arguing that Haiti presents unique challenges due to the absence of functioning institutions and widespread social breakdown. The latter portion of Hour 2 broadens into a historical discussion of Haiti’s revolution, citizenship laws, national identity, and the contrast between Haiti and the neighboring Dominican Republic. Buck and callers examine how the two nations, despite sharing the same island, have experienced dramatically different political and economic outcomes. The conversation covers citizenship policies, migration pressures, environmental degradation, deforestation, economic decline, and the difficulties of rebuilding a nation after decades of instability. Overall, Hour 2 of the program is a comprehensive deep dive into Haiti’s failed-state conditions, TPS policy, immigration reform, border security, deportation debates, humanitarian concerns, gang violence, international intervention, and the consequences of state collapse, with Buck Sexton leading the discussion solo and David Rutherford providing firsthand perspective and security analysis throughout.

Make sure you never miss a second of the show by subscribing to the Clay Travis & Buck Sexton show podcast wherever you get your podcasts!  ihr.fm/3InlkL8

For the latest updates from Clay and Buck, visit our website

Hour 3 of The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show featured Buck Sexton hosting solo and focused heavily on the political implications of New York City’s Democratic mayoral politics, the rise of democratic socialism within the Democratic Party, and a lengthy discussion about air conditioning, climate policy, and American quality of life. Buck opened the hour by examining the growing influence of Zohran Mamdani, arguing that his emergence reflects broader changes within the Democratic Party. Buck discussed Mamdani alongside progressive figures such as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and referenced rising activist Darializa Chevalier, contending that open discussion of socialist policies, wealth taxes, and other progressive proposals is becoming increasingly mainstream among Democrats. He argued that Mamdani is being elevated by the media and prominent Democrats as a significant political figure whose ideas could influence the party nationally. A major portion of the hour centered on Mamdani’s political philosophy and national ambitions. Buck analyzed a television interview in which Mamdani was asked about presidential eligibility requirements for naturalized citizens. Mamdani stated that he supports keeping the Constitution unchanged, despite not being a natural-born citizen himself. Buck used the exchange to argue that Mamdani is becoming a national spokesperson for progressive politics and democratic socialism. He contrasted Mamdani with Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, suggesting that while AOC has moderated some of her rhetoric as her political career has advanced, Mamdani currently represents the leading edge of the Democratic Party’s progressive movement. The discussion then shifted to democratic socialism, with Buck reacting to Mamdani’s argument that New Yorkers have already experienced successful socialist-style governance. Mamdani cited accomplishments including expanded childcare programs, tenant relief initiatives, infrastructure work, and public safety metrics as evidence that progressive policies can deliver tangible results. Buck challenged that framing, arguing that many left-wing policies appear successful in their early stages because benefits are immediate while costs emerge much later. He compared the situation to earlier debates surrounding former New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio, California Governor Gavin Newsom, and the Affordable Care Act, arguing that long-term consequences often become apparent only after policies have been in place for years. Throughout the political segment, Buck criticized what he described as Democratic messaging strategies that downplay the ideological implications of progressive policies. He argued that voters frequently focus on short-term benefits while ignoring potential long-term fiscal and economic consequences. Buck warned that promises of expanded government services, wealth redistribution, and social programs can be politically attractive in the short run but may create larger financial and governance problems over time. He also discussed the historical evolution of socialism, contrasting modern “democratic socialism” with earlier socialist movements and using countries such as Venezuela as cautionary examples of policies that he believes ultimately produced economic decline and reduced personal freedom. Buck further explored how political branding affects public perception, arguing that simply labeling policies as “socialist” is not enough to persuade voters. He noted that many Americans are less ideological than political activists assume and tend to support candidates who appear to provide practical solutions to everyday problems. This led to a broader conversation about political communication, voter behavior, immigration debates, and the challenges Republicans face when trying to counter progressive policy proposals. The final portion of Hour 3 moved away from politics and became an extended and often humorous discussion about air conditioning, extreme heat, and American exceptionalism. Sparked by listener calls and stories from Europe, Buck expressed appreciation for widespread air-conditioning use in the United States and contrasted it with conditions in parts of Europe where air conditioning remains less common. He discussed reports of heat waves in France and other European countries, arguing that resistance to air conditioning has contributed to unnecessary suffering during extreme weather. Buck shared personal anecdotes about his preference for cool indoor temperatures and described himself as an “indoor cat” who relies heavily on air conditioning, especially in hot climates. He praised air conditioning as one of the most significant technological improvements in modern life and suggested that Americans often take its benefits for granted. Listeners from across the country called in to discuss life with and without air conditioning, sharing experiences from Georgia, Washington, Idaho, Massac

Are millennials really the "poor generation," or has the narrative simply outlived the facts?

In this episode of It's a Numbers Game, Ryan Girdusky breaks down the data behind the POOR MILLENNIAL stereotype and explains why today's millennials are far more financially successful than many people believe. From homeownership rates and income growth to the lasting effects of the 2008 financial crisis, Ryan separates perception from reality.

He also explores why many millennials continue to support progressive politics despite improving economic outcomes, arguing that culture—not finances—is driving today's political divide.

EMAIL RYAN

Follow Clay & Buck on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuck

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.